Saturday, February 23, 2008

Unborn in the USA

R and I just finished watching the very interesting--and disturbing--documentary, "Unborn in the USA."

The film takes a very even-handed, non-judgmental look at the "pro-life" (this is not the term I use and will henceforth refer to them as anti-choice) movement in the United States. Basically, these extremely religious people stand on street corners, outside abortion clinics and on college campuses with graphic, horrifying photos to try to change the mind of pro-choicers and women seeking abortions.

I was very moved by the images in the movie, graphic disturbing images that are likely the real remains of abortion even if they are clearly lying about the gestational age. At one point in the film one of the "pro-lifers" holds up a pair of tiny legs and says it is an embryo at 6 weeks--an obvious lie not backed by science given that I know just from being pregnant twice that an embryo that young has only leg buds. Additionally, the photos lack context. It is a fact that most of the "partial birth abortions" (again, a term I would never use) are performed only to save the mother's life or when there is some grave danger to the fetus. Still, the images are deeply disturbing, especially when viewed in the context of my own child and developing pregnancy.

I was raised extremely pro-choice. I protested, held signs, attended NARAL and planned parenthood meetings, talked to women who had abortions. And yet, I was also raised in a fairly rural, conservative part of the Midwest (some would argue it is part of the bible belt) where 90 percent of my classmates were adamantly anti-choice and deeply religious (read: fanatic). As a child, when things were simpler, I just believed them to be stupid and uneducated. Truthfully many of them were the latter, if not the former. Still, having a child has deeply changed my views. Something that was once so simple for me and so knee jerk is no longer.

I had my first ultrasound with Sam at 6 weeks. She was a living being inside me, one who was deeply wanted and whose heartbeat was a blessing. So if she was alive, are the others? And if so, is it murder? I feel extremely lucky that I was never in a position to need an abortion. I am one of the few people I know my age who never had to deal with an unwanted pregnancy. Most of the women and men I know who dealt with this issue had abortions. That is just what upwardly mobile young people do. In fact, I only know of one person who carried to term and kept the baby and that decision is one that hurts the father of the baby everyday since that would not have been his choice (a post for another day). I believe that even with the regrets I know people have, that abortion was the right choice for these friends of mine. Thank goodness all of these women had the choice to make.

And yet, the question remains, is it murder? I watched the film with an open mind and certainly was in agreement with some of what they said. The problem is that the anti-choice movement is mostly comprised of crazy zealots and white men over 40. I am not that interested in what an older man has to say about my reproductive freedom. Further, the images of young children holding these disturbing signs was enough to bring tears to my eyes. Basically, they care enough about other peoples' fetuses to stop them from aborting, but not enough about their young children to shield them from the trauma of these images. I would be pretty angry if Sam and I were walking down the street and some fat women in ugly flowered dresses and their fanny-pack sporting preacher husbands forced her to look at images of bloody fetuses (although I am not sure whether I was disturbed more by their fashion choices or their beliefs). But then, they do not care about my child's feelings. They only care about shocking her mother into not having an abortion.

There were points in the film where I stopped it and got upset, wondering if abortion should be legal. R had to bring me back to reality. The fact is, abhorrent and disgusting as abortion may be, it is an individual choice. Even if it IS murder, which is also an individual call, there are instances in our society (like in war time) where murder is ok. And as R said, it is perfectly legal to shoot an intruder who breaks into one's home and as a scientist, he was the first to say that an embryo/fetus is the very definition of a parasite/intruder. In our case, it was/is a wanted, welcome parasite, but a parasite nonetheless.

No matter how much I let those images get under my skin, no matter how thankful I feel that I never had to make that choice, I will always believe that it is a woman's personal choice and her right to make that choice for herself. The problem with religious zealots is that their arrogance and one-size-fits-all approach to everything is such a lie. There is no universal one right way to think and, in fact, I wondered if some of the people in the film actually had something a little wrong with them. They all seemed a little touched. In fact, one has to be a little crazy to believe that their values and beliefs are the one true way, the best way to be and that our laws should reflect them. So in the end, I remain unswayed. Still, the movie is worth seeing.

2 comments:

Kristi said...

I've heard about this movie, and have wanted to see it. Given my fragile state of mind as of late, I've opted not to, but I will plan on watching it in the future.

And this line of your post: "There is no universal one right way to think" is absolutely key, and the downfall of those crazy anti-choicers. Just because you think it doesn't make it so.

Amy said...

W., I came across your blog, and I want to thank for your honest thoughts. I think your question about whether or not it is murder is exactly the key question we need to answer as a society. This is probably why having your own child and seeing the pictures of aborted fetuses has made you think again about the issues involved. When we see what's hidden inside us, that brings the only important question to the forefront of the debate. This is hard for us women to face. Who wants to question whether the fetus is a human being after already having an abortion? It's just too painful. But I think we need to do this.

>>The problem is that the anti-choice movement is mostly comprised of crazy zealots and white men over 40. I am not that interested in what an older man has to say about my reproductive freedom.

I think you're absolutely right when you say that the most important question here is, is this murder? Is this fetus a human being worthy of rights? Keeping that in mind, I think it's important to remember that this question can (and should) be addressed by everyone in the human community, not just young women. Everyone--men and women, old and young--has a right and a duty to speak about the rights of humankind. As women, we need to stop thinking that this question ought to be decided only by us, since the way our society decides to treat human beings will ultimately affect everyone.

>>The fact is, abhorrent and disgusting as abortion may be, it is an individual choice. Even if it IS murder, which is also an individual call, there are instances in our society (like in war time) where murder is ok.

I don't think this is really true. Murder--the deliberate killing of an innocent human being--is not the same as protecting yourself from someone who would harm you (as would be the case with an intruder or an enemy in wartime). No one who is against abortion would prevent an abortion in a case where the woman would die from the pregnancy (since the competing rights as human beings are equal--life vs. life). But nobody in our society is allowed to kill another person who will merely cause them inconvenience (the number one reason for abortion--only 1% are because of rape and only 2.8% are because of the mother's health. See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Abortion_in_the_United_States.)

And beyond that, I know you don't think your unborn child was an intruder and a parasite. Aren't those just words we use to describe fetuses when we want to justify getting rid of them, but words we never use when we actually want them? This is disturbing because it means we're giving some women (and I'm saying this as a woman!) the power to define, based on their mere preference, who is and who is not a human worthy of rights. The problem, then, matches what Kristi said, although from a different direction: Just because a person thinks an unborn child isn't a human doesn't make it so. That kind of thinking has never worked out well in the past regarding other humans because it inevitably ends up with the oppression the least powerful.

>>Still, having a child has deeply changed my views. Something that was once so simple for me and so knee jerk is no longer.

I do applaud you for considering this. It's easy for pro-choice people to think that the opposing side is only motivated by wanting to keep people down. But I think when you get a glimpse of the real arguments behind their position, and see the real question they're asking (is the fetus human?), that's when the real debate about the most important question can happen.

I don't think we need to resort to an individual call on this question. I think it's very possible to determine logically and ethically whether an unborn child is deserving of the same rights as a newborn. As women, we just need to get beyond any feelings of guilt or anxiety and forgive ourselves so we can get past the emotion and carefully consider the arguments and the responsibility we have towards every member of the human race. But no woman should beat herself up for the past. Let's move forward! Thanks for listening.